Break you yourself in half and just eat one half. If that half grows to dual its dimension you have your answer.

You are watching: If i ate myself would i be twice as big or disappear


*

*

*

*

*

YourNeighborhoodComicGeek said:

It"s a paradox.

No it"s not, the prize is you"d disappear, simple as that.


YourNeighborhoodComicGeek said:

It"s a paradox.

No it"s not, the prize is you"d disappear, straightforward as that.

You can"t eat your very own mouth.


Matter deserve to not it is in erased, only changed into various forms. Therefore neither, you"d continue to be the exact same size but you wouldn"t disappear. Food doesn"t disappear it simply adds to her mass but since you room eating your very own mass you would just change form, no size. In this case ending up being a heap of chewed increase meat. Yet it"s additionally impossible to eat your whole self since you"d it is in dead long before you finished...what one odd question.


YourNeighborhoodComicGeek said:

It"s a paradox.

No it"s not, the prize is you"d disappear, straightforward as that.

You can"t eat your very own mouth.

You certain as hell don"t acquire twice the dimension lol


If girlfriend ate your finger for an example... You wouldn"t digest the in a means so that you"d include 100% of its massive to your own.You would certainly only be able to extract a trivial lot of mass from the finger. So you wouldn"t end up being twice as large. Its impossible (as mentioned) come eat ones me entirely. So, neither...


Enemybird: it is a scientific principle, its prefer asking me for an example of heaviness in nature. Tho in this instance it is a bizarre question so there is nothing prefer this in nature. You can say the if something eats something else whole, then it is similar. The entire mass of the two organisms is currently in the eater. In the instance of eating you yourself you would be taking all of your very own mas and also converting it right into another type of mass without any change overall except that which comes from the entropy the a living being.


I feel like I might probably find an image which would certainly answer that question for us, yet if i posted it, ns would acquire banned.

I"m guessing you would certainly be much less than fifty percent eaten prior to you died...unless girlfriend used numerous tourniquets to store yourself native bleeding out, but you would certainly still probably die indigenous shock...unless you gave yourself morphine or something...in which case you might probably only eat every the meat turn off of one leg before your stomach would certainly be totally full. Room you bulimic in this scenario due to the fact that otherwise i think that is as far as girlfriend get.

Well, that was gross.


Enemybird: the is a scientific principle, its like asking me for an example of heaviness in nature. Still in this situation it is a bizarre concern so there is nothing prefer this in nature. You could say the if something eats something rather whole, climate it is similar. The whole mass the the 2 organisms is currently in the eater. In the situation of eating yourself you would certainly be taking all of your very own mass and converting it right into another type of mass without any adjust overall except that which comes from the entropy the a life being.

See more: What Does Water Under The Bridge Mean ? Water Under The Bridge

Its a principle the doesn"t apply correctly. Ns asked you to find and also example in nature because as you understand the act of eating is a metabolic function. If you to be able to eat yourself, energy would it is in expended. Even more so since your room eating yourself. The as whole mass would certainly be smaller. There isnt an example in nature where energy isn"t loss.